Your approach to large-scale data extraction is fundamentally broken. You are attempting to conduct a distributed intelligence operation with tools designed for circumventing regional blocks. The inevitable result is IP bans, rate limiting, and datasets riddled with gaps that render any subsequent analysis worthless. The failure point is not your parsing logic; it is your arrogant neglect of the network layer.
Modern anti-bot systems are probabilistic intrusion detection engines. They construct a fingerprint from hundreds of signals: TCP window size, TLS cipher order, HTTP header sequencing, and, most critically, IP reputation and behavior. A single IP making sequential, scripted requests to /api/product/ endpoints is trivial to identify and blacklist. The solution is not smarter scripting; it is becoming statistically indistinguishable from legitimate human traffic at the network level. This requires an infrastructure of appropriate scale and sophistication, not a list of proxy addresses.

The Naïve Hybrid Fallacy and IP Reputation Thermodynamics
The common, flawed intuition is to simply acquire “residential” IPs. The assumption is that any IP from an ISP is inherently trustworthy. This is a dangerous oversimplification. IP reputation is a dynamic score. An IP from a residential subnet that yesterday served benign user traffic but today is making programmatic requests to 50 different e-commerce sites across three continents has undergone a catastrophic reputation shift. Security systems do not just blacklist the IP; they blacklist the entire surrounding subnet, contaminating your entire pool.
Once, in a stroke of misguided genius, we attempted to build a “stealth” pool by provisioning thousands of low-cost VPS instances across various cloud providers, each with a single residential proxy tunnel. The theory was perfect: a unique, clean IP per scraping thread. The result was comical. The sheer volume of simultaneous tunnel establishments from our core network triggered internal DDoS alerts. Worse, the cloud providers’ own security flagged the pattern as credential-stuffing attacks, suspending hundreds of accounts within hours. We had built a spectacular, self-inflicted denial-of-service machine. The lesson was brutal: scale without orchestration is just noise.
The correct architecture employs a segregated, multi-tiered proxy pool managed by a central controller. High-performance datacenter IPs from diverse, low-profile autonomous systems handle bulk HTML fetching. A separate, premium residential network, its usage carefully throttled and mimicked to normal human browse rates, is reserved for JavaScript-heavy targets and critical API calls. The controller is the brain: it monitors success rates, response times, and CAPTCHA triggers per IP subnet, proactively rotating out degrading segments before they fail. It understands that IP reputation is a non-renewable resource to be spent strategically.
Why IPv4 is the Battlefield, Not a Legacy Protocol
The debate is irrelevant. The global commercial web—the target environment—runs on IPv4. Its routing tables, firewall rules, and, most importantly, security vendor threat intelligence feeds are optimized for IPv4. Deploying an IPv6 proxy fleet introduces asymmetry: your requests may be forced through translation layers, creating unique fingerprints, while your target’s logging and blocking systems may simply ignore the v6 traffic or handle it inconsistently. For consistent, predictable results, you must fight on the incumbent’s terrain. This necessitates managing large, expensive pools of IPv4 addresses, with all the associated logistical overhead of subnet warming and reputation management. There is no alternative.
From Script to Pipeline: The Engineering Mindset
The client-side component is not a “scraper.” It is a distributed data ingestion pipeline. Each node must be engineered for persistence, with automatic retry logic, request pacing, and seamless proxy failover. The proxy gateway is not a static endpoint; it is an API that, per request, returns the optimal exit node based on the target’s domain, geolocation requirement, and current health metrics. Session affinity must be maintained where needed, demanding coordination between your application and the proxy network.
The ultimate metric is data continuity. A pipeline with 99.9% uptime over a billion requests is a feat of systems engineering. One that fails 5% of the time is generating costly, misleading artifacts. Achieving the former requires acknowledging that the proxy network is a critical, stateful component of your application stack. It is not a commodity service; it is the foundation of your data’s integrity.
The conclusion is inescapable. If you are troubleshooting parsing errors more often than you are analyzing trends, you have misplaced your priority. Reliable competitive intelligence in 2024 is not a software problem. It is an infrastructure problem. Build or buy a network that can withstand the scrutiny, or accept that your data—and the decisions based on it—are built on sand.